Podcasting

There is some really interesting things going on in this realm of podcasting.

What is podcasting? There is a definition on the Wikipedia. Dave Slusher boils down a podcast to three things:

  1. Must be a discrete and downloadable media file
  2. Published in an RSS 2.0 enclosure feed
  3. Handled automatically on the receiver end, downloaded and moved to where it needs to be and put in the playlists for your playback device

Doc Searls probably has the most linked to post on the subject.

iPodderX is the first newsreader for audio files. You subscribe to feeds and it downloads any audio contained in them. It is a very simple application at this point that will undoubtly evolve.

Adam Curry is probably the biggest cheerleader for podcasting right now. You can check out the iPodder.org website. You can also start listening to his Daily Source Code.

One last thing – I had a post back on September 3rd where I described what needed to happen with audio blogging:

I think it is going to take some more experimenting in form and function. How can I easily record post and upload them? What if it was easy for readers to download audio posts onto their iPod and listen to them later? RSS readers detecting audio posts, downloading the new ones, and putting them into a playlist on iTunes?

How about that? Some others saw the same thing and made something happen. I love the stuff that is going on with this. You will see an experiment from me soon.

PR Pitfalls with Bloggers

There has been an interesting discussion started around PR and blogging. It started with John and Richard of the Marketing Playbook sending out some email to bloggers telling them about their new book. Peter Davidson immediately stepped in and called the authors out for sending out spam and not knowing how to pitch to bloggers. All sorts of people have chimed in since including Kristen and Rich. The boys at MP have posted an apology or two.

I talked about how I liked the book over at 800-CEO-READ, but in this post I want to talk about the PR and blogging.

Here is my thoughts on the subject:

  1. Blogs are people and people are posting things that interest them. Those seeking PR have to read the blog to know if what you are offering is going to be a fit. Also understand that bloggers talk about everything, and that anything is fair game from the moment you contact them.
  2. Those seeking PR need to send links. That is the basis for the medium. Give me a link I can read and send others to.
  3. Don’t get cheap. I had a person pitch me with a .pdf file of a chapter from a book. I showed interest, asked for a copy, and was turned down. If you want some love, don’t just flirt with me.
  4. PR people need to know bloggers are going to be a hard sell. I don’t think I have endorsed a product or service that has been pitched to me. I know this to be common with other bloggers too. [P.S. it is a little different over at 800-CEO-READ. I talk to authors, publishers, and PR people all the time.]

Audio Blogging Manifesto

Maciej Ceglowski at Idle Words has recorded an Audioblogging Manifesto.

Ceglowski is not a big fan of audioblogging. To make his point, I think he makes it as painful as possible to listen to his entry. He spells out web addresses (h-t-t-p-colon-backslash-backslash…). He starts background music halfway through that sound like the theme to “Hunt for Red October” and increased the volume as he marches toward the conclusion.

I don’t disagree with many of the declarations Geglowski professes in his audio post. People do read faster. The web is about motion (page to page, top to bottom) and with audio posts, the reader has to stop and listen. It is not as efficient.

I still think there is a place for audioblogging. I think readers will listen to an occasional post. You can convey additional information using emphasis, intonation, and cadence. Put links you refer to beneath the link to the audiopost to provide relevance. It adds more personality to your blog.

I think it is going to take some more experimenting in form and function. How can I easily record post and upload them? What if it was easy for readers to download audio posts onto their iPod and listen to them later? RSS readers detecting audio posts, downloading the new ones, and putting them into a playlist on iTunes?

P.S. If you are still against the whole audio thing, you can read Geglowski’s manifesto here.

Finetuning – Question 4

I get a lot of people who tell me that if they can get lots of people read their blog they will consider it a success. More eyeballs the better. These are people who still have a media viewpoint of the web.

I believe traffic is important, but linking and commenting are each equally important also. It is about conversations. That means you need people listening (traffic), but you also need people talking back (links and comments).

Today’s question: In your experience, what kinds of entries generate the most comments?

I think I could also ask: What sort of entries do you comment on? What qualities or traits do they have?

Good stuff

Greedy Girl had some good stuff yesterday.

GG points to Keiko, blogger/clothing designer. I have to agree with GG – “This young woman has more innate marketing savior faire than many of the oh-so-dull business bloggers I struggle to read each day.” Keiko is creating a lifestyle on her blog, she is creating something you want to become a part of.

GG also points to the new State Business Tax Climate Report from the Tax Foundation. I am happy and a little surprise to see Wisconsin right in the middle of the pack.

State Indexed Score Rank
Wyoming 8.30 1 (Best)
New Hampshire 8.05 2
Wisconsin 5.69 28
California 4.36 49
Mississippi 3.97 50 (Worst)

Finetuning – Question 3

I got sidetracked this week on a couple of projects. I am going to keep running the Finetuning questions into next week. I hope you’ll keep adding your thoughts.

Today I want to talk about the length of an entry. I can very quickly say there is no minimum. I have used only a couple words and a link make an entry. It doesn’t add a lot to the discussion, but sometimes that is OK.

The more interesting discussion is about the maximum. A year ago, I would have said that you don’t want an entry to run longer than four or five paragraphs. I think that has changed. Readers are more tolerant of longer posts with interesting ideas. When I say longer, I am thinking of 10 paragraphs.

I think there is still a maximum. I wouldn’t recommend writing 30 paragraphs in a single entry. I think the reader will leave you and click on to something else.

So…

Today’s question is: How long is too long for a blog entry? Use paragraphs as your unit of measure.

Finetuning – Question 2

We all know linking is an essential part of blogging. It creates conversation. It creates connections.

I want to talk about the words that bloggers hyperlink to in their entries. I think for the most part the decision process is unconscious, I think it is important to look at.

As I look through my own blog, my strategy varies. I find if I am talking about someone else I will highlight the verb in the sentence (i.e. Zach Braff of Scrubs fame is writing a blog to promote his new movie…).

I often hyperlink to the objects I want to highlight, like companies and blogs.

I also know that I will construct sentences differently if I need to put two links in the sentence. I always make sure that links aren’t next to each other and that there are words between them. I want to eliminate any confusion about where a reader will be going.

This almost reminds me of the exercises you would go through as a kid where you practiced emphasizing different words in a sentence. It showed how the sentence’s meaning can differ with a slight change. I think linking is like that.

The other consideration is search engines. Scoble told me he doesn’t really think about what words he links to, but sometimes thinks about how a search engine will view the links. I find it is sometimes hard to figure out a link when I am looking at an excerpt in Technorati.

So, here are the two questions to answer:

1. How do you decide what words to create links on?

2. Are there larger issues to consider when creating links in your blog?

FineTuning – Question One

Frequency

There is no question that maintaining a blog requires new material which is delivered on a regular basis. Anyone who writes an advice column on blogging will always mention this. It is also the top reason given for why people stop blogging – the burnout.

I think RSS has changed the need for posts every day. With the time saving component of RSS readers, people don’t care as much about frequency.

So two questions –

1. What is the acceptable minimum for blogging frequency? This answer should contain a number (i.e. once per day, once per week, etc).

2. What are the factors that control what the acceptable minimum is? My first thought is the age of a blog. Older blogs with established readership can post less often. When you are first starting out, providing lots of new material is very important. The topic of your blog can also dictate frequency.

So, comments and trackbacks are on. What do you think?